Real Estate in Margaret River
Saturday 19 March 2016
Wednesday 9 March 2016
Wednesday 24 February 2016
Wednesday 17 February 2016
Wednesday 10 February 2016
Wednesday 3 February 2016
Sunday 24 January 2016
Two Offer Situation
They're every buyer’s worst enemy and every seller’s best
friend!
As real estate consultants we are ethically obliged to act
in the best interests of the seller. After all it is the seller who pays the commission!
So we are instructed to get as much as possible for our
sellers, working within market conditions and seller’s expectations or
requirements. For example if we receive a low offer and know that the property
is in fact worth a lot more, it would be negligent of us to accept that without
question or encouragement to at least meet market value, and then present to
our sellers hoping they will just accept. Sellers employ us on contract to sell
their properties and for us to do our best for them.
So when a two offer situation occurs it generally means that
the seller is in an advantage (not always the case!) as two buyers will be
competing against each other. There is a lot of confusion about how this
situation unfolds and a lot of distrust from buyers to consultants. The scenario
can and should only work in one way
and most often the case there is always a disgruntled and upset buyer. Just how
it works unfortunately.
If buyer A writes
up an offer and gives it to the consultant and the consultant is aware of
another offer coming in, they advise buyer
A that there might be another offer coming in – you will be advised if this
is the case. In the meantime buyer A’s
offer will not be presented to the seller until it is confirmed whether or not Buyer B is presenting.
Even though Buyer A
has presented an offer first, it does not mean that first in best dressed.
Remember the consultant is acting for the seller, so in this case, the
consultant would wait until Buyer B
finalizes that decision. Now of course you wouldn’t sit around for weeks on buyer B, this delay would only be
happening if another seriously interested party was communicating to the
consultant and advising of such. If there is no other talks of offers, then Buyer A’s offer would be presented.
So Buyer B writes
up an offer but is advised that there is another offer also. So the consultant
would say to Buyer B, you
have one chance to present your one and only best offer. So buyer B would put down their best
price, deposit, finance period, settlement date etc. Then Buyer A is advised that Buyer
B has written up their one and only best offer, and that Buyer A now has the opportunity to
adjust their first offer knowing that a second offer will also be presented. Buyer A may adjust their offer or be
comfortable with what they have already offered.
Then both contracts get presented at the same time to the
seller and the seller decides which offer they like best.
The seller’s choices are to
a) accept an offer and reject another
b) reject one offer
and counter the other or
c) reject both, but unlikely as the seller may as well
negotiate on one and see if they can get the price they want.
At no time is the consultant allowed to communicate to the
buyers what the other buyer’s offer is. Such an approach would be deemed to be
unethical to the buyer and sometimes referred to as a ‘dutch auction’.
As you can tell it can be a little complicated and when
emotions are high, it is hard to trust that the consultant is in fact doing the
right thing. But if you do miss out, you have every right to ask why the other
offer proceeded and yours didn’t. If the offer was subject to finance, the sale
price cannot be disclosed until the contract is unconditional but the
consultant would be able to say – “they paid more than you” for example and you
could get clarification at a later date if you wished.
Why not disclose the sale price til unconditional? Again
this comes down to working in the seller’s best interest. That offer may not come together as the finance
might fall through, and if we publicise what the seller once accepted, other
buyers wouldn’t be prepared to offer any more as they already know what the
seller has previously accepted. In the future a buyer may inspect the property
and offer more, as they believe it’s worth more to them or the market has
changed.
If you have any queries regarding this and would like to discuss it further I would be happy to assist. Send me an email or give me a call.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)